Headline

Ryzen Threadripper 16C / 32T, GeekBench Performance Disembark

Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 16C / 32T
The Ryzen Threadripper 16C 32T is a new present in AMD GeekBench benchmark database is optimization phase of its performance

Ryzen Threadripper 16C / 32T, GeekBench performance land

With the Ryzen Threadripper , AMD will tackle the Intel HETC segment, especially its Core-X chips. This family will propose a chip with 16 physical cores and 32 logical cores. A few weeks before its launch, it appears in the Geekbench benchmark database.
This is not the first time that this processor makes its appearance of this software . This makes it possible to see the progress made by AMDGeekBench identifies the processor under AMD reference ZD1840A8UGAF4 @ 3.40 GHz (1 processor, 16 cores, 32 threads). It has been tested on an AMD Whitehaven OPS rev B motherboard equipped with 32 GB of RAM.
The Ryzen Threadripper 16C 32T is a new present in AMD GeekBench benchmark database is optimization phase of its performance

Ryzen Threadripper 16C / 32T, performance under GeekBench

We obtain scores of 4074 single-core and 26768 multi-core. here are the details
The Ryzen Threadripper 16C 32T is a new present in AMD GeekBench benchmark database is optimization phase of its performance

The Ryzen Threadripper 16C 32T is a new present in AMD GeekBench benchmark database is optimization phase of its performance

In front of the previous scores we have a clear progression in multi-hearts since the score climbs 24723 points to 26768. In single-core test, the situation is reversed with a slight decrease from 4216 to 4074. AMD is well in phase Optimization for this next novelty. It should be noted that it is naturally necessary to remain cautious in the face of all this.

About: MehdiMed

Admin

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco.

Blogger
Disqus
Select System Comments What You Love

No comments